Focus MALAYSIA WEEKLY ISSUE 055
THE WEEK OF DECEMBER 21 –
DECEMBER 27, 2013
Review 2013 / Outlook
2014 -- BANKING
By: FocusM
Pong Teng Siew, Head of Research Interpac Securities Sdn. Bhd. |
The banking sector has
begun to face headwinds it has not faced since the Asian financial crisis. Unlike US banks, most Malaysian banks still
earn revenue the old-fashioned way, from transaction fees and a net interest
spread income. Net interest income has
been declining because of competitive forces as well as due to nature of
lending. Consumer loans were very lucrative
for a long spell after the Asian financial crisis because they offered better
margins than corporate loans and represented better spread risks; and some
(residential property loans) taxed capital less due to their lower risk
weights. However, competition has
squeezed the margins on such loans and more recently, despite the profit
imperative, the focus moved away from one of the fastest-growing segments,
personal loans, because of the realisation that as the economic cycle matures,
income growth will slow and household debt has accumulated to systematically
worrisome levels after years of rapid credit expansion.
Malaysia’s banking system
loans growth peaked at 13.8% year-on-year (y-o-y) in September 2011, and
consistently outstripped nomical GDP growth (if that can be taken as a
yardstick of income growth) in the period following a three-year spell of
systematic deleveraging after the Asian financial crisis. Nominal GDP growth stood at 4.7% y-o-y in Q3
2013 and pales in comparison to a loans growth of nearly 10% y-o-y
currently. Only in the “safe” lending
segments of infrastructure construction and development and carry trade-type
loans for purchase ASB / ASN units are local banks still lending aggressively.
Net interest income has
been on the decline for what may be an eternity and no temporary relief from
BLR hike is on the cards. The central
bank is decidedly pro-growth and takes pain to emphasise it is not an
inflation-targeting bank. It can be
expected to resist any upward pressure on interest rates for as long as
possible although for all countries, the long end of the fixed-income spectrum
can be expected to clime as the US Fed contemplates a tapering off of its
bond-purchase programme.
Asset quality remains
well-behaved but recognising that the impaired assets ratio is ever closer to
the zero bound, no further gain should be expected in this direction. Scattered loan losses related to corporate
failure will not cause systemic events but if global commodity prices take a
beating in a global economic downturn, and if interest rates climb sharply in
conjunction with an unexpectedly aggressive move to an end to quantitative
easing in the US, which can cause a pronounced ringgit weakness, debt-service
pressure could surface with respect to a smattering of corporations and
individuals. Disruptive currency moves
that stoke inflation and corporate distress situations could also affect
Malaysian banks now that many more have in recent years moved to expand
regionally in search of profits. Vulnerable
emerging market economies include Turkey , Indonesia and India but it is instructive
that even the isolated Blumont/Asiasons/LionGold episode in ”safe” economies
like Singapore can cause unexpected and
significant losses.
Specific prices of equity
issues in the Asia-Pacific have risen sharply, some to bubble levels; and
sudden and severe pullbacks could be disruptive even if the main indices remain
relatively stable. Most major banking
groups in Malaysia have equity trading and
derivatives exposure and unexpectedly large losses could arise if a generalized
price correction suddenly takes hold. Bank
balance sheets are notoriously opaque to offering predictive qualities to any
analysis of such risks.
No comments:
Post a Comment